Tag Archive: Dicamba

Monsanto’s risky triple herbicide-tolerant soybeans to enter South Africa’s food systems

ACB warns that the South African government has received an application for the commodity clearance (import for food, feed and processing) of ‘triple-stacked variety of genetically modified (GM) soya – MON 87708 X MON 89788 X A5547-127 by Monsanto South Africa (Pty) Ltd in October 2017.

This GM Soybean variety represent has been genetically engineered to withstand applications of a cocktail of 3 toxic herbicides: glyphosate, glufosinate and dicamba. South Africa will be among the first countries to approve this GM variety after Mexico and South Korea.

Although the ACB has objected to the application, the permissive South African regulatory system is bound to approve it. In this event, South Africans will be exposed to even more toxic cocktail of chemicals –adding to that already present in the country’s feed and food systems and raising safety concerns and risks that are yet to be established

Such a situation is unacceptable, untenable and should no longer continue. Urgent transformation of South Africa’s food systems is required to those that are socially just and ecologically sustainable.

Download alert

ACB’s Objection to Monsanto’s Application for Commodity Clearance of MON 87708 × MON 89788 × A5547-127 Triple-Stacked Herbicide Tolerant Soybean

ACB is objecting to the commodity clearance of the triple-stacked GM soybean event MON 87708 x MON 89788 x A5547-127, due to concerns surrounding the lack of safety assessment data for this crop and the known toxicity of the three pesticides it is designed to tolerate.

Its tolerance to three pesticides, glyphosate, glufosinate and dicamba will only increase the exposure of South African citizens to ever increasing amounts of chemicals in their food systems, while South African regulators are yet to fully establish legal limits for these chemical on our crops.

Under these circumstances, we urge the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF) to decline approval until these safety uncertainties have been adequately addressed.

Download PDF